This site has already examined the bizarre fringe views, seemingly, from Labour South Thanet Candidate, Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt. Both Gordon-Nesbitt and the Labour Party are understood to have not yet commented upon her links to the now infamous Centre for Cultural Change.
Over the weekend The Jewish Chronicle also reported on the shocking revelation that in spite of the allegations of anti-semitism, Gordon-Nesbitt is due to speak under the chairmanship of Jackie Walker. Walker remains one of the best known individuals to have been suspended by the Labour Party for allegations of anti-semitism. Walker remains suspended by the Labour Party pending an inquiry. Gordon-Nesbitt has also not commented upon this revelation.
In the face of the embattled candidate’s refusal to comment, we have turned our consideration to the candidate’s “team”.
Once more a troubling trend emerges…
Take this from Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt’s head of “logistics”, Estelle Rosenfeld. A few weeks ago she decided to share a story about her view of an image that would under English Law amount to a crime.¹
Why did Rosenfeld share this peculiar missive?
Rosenfeld believes that the mural, widely condemned as anti-semitic and which triggered widespread Jewish protest has nothing to do with “Jews”.
But, *hey* – what about UKIP?
Signed,
Helpfully, Ms Rosenfeld also coordinated its dissemination with the notorious Jackie Walker.
Also on Dr Gordon-Nesbitt’s team is her ‘agent’ Chris Nicholas, who also happens to be a fan of the still suspended Jackie Walker
He likes her ‘one-woman play’ on Facebook too.
Lastly consider the words of Gordon-Nesbitt’s ‘handfasted partner’ Kyle McCallum – who like her partner tweets under a pseudonym.
He likes to intimate seeming threats to people who admit to holding ‘conservative’ views.
Chilling…
With some strong views on capitalism.
Almost as if, the holders of fringe views on Jews/communism/etc. in Thanet had got together and picked a candidate whose views matched their own…
______________
- R v Stamford [1988]/R v Graham-Kerr [1972].
2 thoughts on “Digging Deeper into the Gordon-Nesbitt Files”